Comments on: Greenskins versus Meta-game: Are Orks Competitive?

By: TheKingElessar

TheKingElessar — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:25:53 +0000

Why do you assume that those AREN’T the people being played? Or that they’re better than their local Ork players? Not everyone can afford to travel the country to games after dropping hundreds on an army.

By: Teh Warboss

Teh Warboss — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:08:28 +0000

HAHAHA! This thread makes me laugh! “Orks are not competitive”? You know, playing against scrubs doesn’t count… Maybe those that think Orks aren’t competitive need to play people who win GT’s, and not brag about trashing n00bs at their LGS. Play against real players! Seriously.

By: The Dragon

The Dragon — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:30:12 +0000

Yeah I figured that comment would kill it-but good.

By: The Dragon

The Dragon — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:51:01 +0000

So anyone here ever play 40k?

It’s got some pretty amusing fluff involving xeno scum, abhumans, and a mentally retarded/idiot savant ethnic group called ‘green skins’ who are dirty violent animals filled with nothing other than a desire to rend enemies apart for fun in a ‘good fight’.

.. oh and it’s got space catholics.

…

Does that mean the Traitor forces are protestants?

By: Black Matt

Black Matt — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:55:09 +0000

your right, excuse me.

By: Slate_Blank

Slate_Blank — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 09:31:53 +0000

I rarely leave comments, certainly not on petty fighting, but this is one of those things that drives me nuts. Let me preface my comments by saying that I truly enjoy the blog and generally the discussion that follows. Normally I find this site has very low “dumbass commentitis.”

Having said that let me get to the point… The reason that so many folks pre-approve comments these days is because someone with a grudge, legitimate or not, feels that they should excercise their passive-aggressive belligerence over the interweb. If Black Matt and Stelek (neither or which I know) have actual and real conflict then Black Matt should man up and e-mail or call him directly instead of subjecting all of us this thread.

By: TheKingElessar

TheKingElessar — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 22:07:17 +0000

Seriously, the pot is just calling the kettle Black Matt…Drop it, or do it elsewhere.

By: Black Matt

Black Matt — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:28:13 +0000

no, you still look stupid.

By: Stelek

Stelek — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 03:22:18 +0000

Woah, back the train up. I was merely asking if ‘Black Matt’ was actually black, or another kiddie with a ‘cool’ name. I wasn’t being sarcastic. Putting black in your moniker is bad form in my view, it’s akin to virtual blackface.
Hope that clears that up. :)

By: TheKingElessar

TheKingElessar — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:14:43 +0000

This is pretty crap.
Matt, there’s no point in apologising to Danny, then continuing to slabber to Stelek on DANNY’S thread.

Email him, put it on BMBLB, or comment on YTTH if you want, don’t be a pussy, and don’t piss around.

Stelek has plenty of your BatReps and lists to see, so he has more than enough info to base an opinion on. You started on him, also.

Race isn’t an issue here, it was a joke. You may not think it was funny…but a more than cursory examination of Stelek’s blog shows him to be anything but a racist.

Also, Matt, when you’re the one commenting, not him, it doesn’t make him look stupid…

By: Black Matt

Black Matt — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:57:47 +0000

I forgot to mention how stupid you look now!

By: Black Matt

Black Matt — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:47:57 +0000

@ stelek,
How do you know whether I am good or bad. Ill be bad just for you. Youve proved my point well! Your a miserable asshole!

By: Magilla Gurilla

Magilla Gurilla — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:36:28 +0000

Whoa!

Look, I understand smack talk, but why did someone have to bring race into the equation?
What does the color of someone’s skin have to do with anything?
I have always enjoyed you sarcastic humor Stelek, but can we please leave race out of it? Those of us who are “black” would appreciate it.

By: Stelek

Stelek — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:15:43 +0000

Actually, I’m preaching how bad you are. Not how awesome I am. If by virtue of your suck, I am ‘awesome’, so be it.

Therapy? Sure, call it the unsuck treatment.

Check your preconceptions or they might check you.

By: TheKingElessar

TheKingElessar — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:57:14 +0000

Don’t understand the Ork comment?

Did you read the original thread/Danny’s comments/Stelek’s blog in the last 6 months?

By: Black Matt

Black Matt — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:13:35 +0000

I dont understand the ork comment. I dont own orks and I have played chaos since the previous codex was introduced. If my complex involves not wanting to tolerate assholes preach how awesome they are, then I will pass on the therapy.

By: Stelek

Stelek — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:56:16 +0000

Black Matt: You’re a peach yourself, obviously. My misery grows when I see orktards winning tournaments and calling their army ‘competitive’. Why don’t you guys save all your pennies for the Space Wolves, the next FOTM coming out. They actually are competitive. They might even help you with your complex, Black Matt.

PS Are you actually Black?

By: TheKingElessar

TheKingElessar — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:56:26 +0000

No, because Walkers are vehicles, not Infantry.

Therefore, they HAVE to use Vehicle LOS.

Also, many Walkers don’t have eyes. :)

By: Josiah

Josiah — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:37:17 +0000

I seem like to have engrish speeking skillz.

Anyways, is another valid reading on the term “visible” to use the main LOS description from the BRB and say that anything that can draw a line to the walker’s eyes is “visible.” Obviously the walker might not have line of sight with it’s weapons.

Is that a valid argument?

By: Black Matt

Black Matt — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:02:03 +0000

@stelek
you seem like to have such a shit personality. I hope you arent as miserable as you come off.